Planning Department San Francisco Building Drawings

• Introduction to ADA Coordinator Review: Architectural Admission for City Projects
• Who Needs to Comply?
• ADA Coordinators/Contact Information
• Documenting Approval past MOD (or DPW)
• MOD Project Approval Procedure
• The Three Different Phases of Review
• Preliminary Review
• Plan Review
• Field Inspection
• Appeals Procedure

Introduction to ADA Coordinator Review: Architectural Access for City Projects

The Mayor'southward Role on Inability (MOD) is the City's overall ADA Coordinator, responsible for ensuring that all City programs, services, and facilities are accessible as required under the ADA. MOD provides architectural plan check and field inspection services to ensure that all City-owned or City funded structure projects (Urban center Projects) comply with the architectural admission standards in the ADA, whether that piece of work is performed by City staff or private construction contractors working on behalf of the City of San Francisco.

Modern works with the City's other ADA Coordinators at the Department of Public Works (DPW), the PORT, and the Airport to accomplish consistent enforcement of the architectural access provisions in the ADA since public funding triggers compliance with Federal access laws and requirements that are non otherwise found in the California Building Code (CBC). This process was established by the Mayor of San Francisco, through executive order dated June 22, 1998, to ensure that all structure projects undertaken by the Urban center'southward Departments are accessible to and usable by persons with disabilities.

Who Needs to Comply?

City Projects must exist reviewed by either the Mayor'due south Role on Disability (MOD) or the DPW Disability Admission Coordinator (DPW DAC). DPW DAC reviews projects designed, managed, or built by DPW, and Modern reviews the rest including publicly funded affordable housing. The PORT and the Drome accept their own ADA Coordinator reviews for projects under their jurisdiction.

ADA Coordinators/Contact Information

Mod Projects. New Construction or alteration projects conducted by or on behalf of other Urban center and Canton of San Francisco departments or agencies, and architectural bulwark removal projects funded in whole or in part by Modernistic are to be reviewed by the MOD ADA Coordinator. MOD charges plan bank check fees for this service and the fee schedule is included on the project intake form (pdf). Jim.Whipple@sfgov.org, (telephone 415- 554-6789, Fax 415-554-6159, TTY 415-6799).

DPW Projects. New structure and amending projects designed and managed by DPW are reviewed by the DPW ADA Coordinator. Kevin.W.Jensen@sfdpw.org telephone 415-557-4685, fax 558-4519, TTY 558-4088

Port of SF Projects. New construction and amending projects conducted by or on behalf of the Port of San Francisco are reviewed past the Port'due south ADA Coordinator, Wendy Proctor, wendy.proctor@sfport.com, telephone 415-274-0592.

San Francisco Airport. New construction or amending projects at SFO are reviewed past the Airport ADA Coordinator Davis Ko, davis.ko@flysfo.com, telephone 650-821-7834, fax 650-821-7779.

Documenting Approval by Modernistic (or DPW)

The ADA Coordinator reviews City Projects before the plans and permits are submitted to the Department of Building Inspection (DBI). The Mod Disability Access Compliance project sign-off form (or DPW equivalent when appropriate) shall be reproduced on the cover sail of the plans for MOD'south projection approval sign-off. For projects that have a sequential review, plans will non exist accepted by DBI without prior review documented sign off from the advisable admission compliance agency (MOD or DPW). For projects submitted under a parallel review procedure, then MOD or DPW must receive the initial plans at the same time as the other allow review agencies, and subsequent revisions must be coordinated. If you lot take questions nigh a City Projection, or want to know whether Modern or DPW or will exist responsible for the accessibility review, or how to obtain forms, please contact Mod at 415 554-6789, MOD@SFGOV.org or review the following detailed Mod Projection Approval Procedures.

Modern Project Approval Procedure

Modern has a highly detailed plan review and field inspection process that in many cases exceeds the quality command standards at other agencies such as the Department of Building Inspection. DPW's procedure is very similar to Mod's. This is because the ADA Standards have Civil Rights provisions for not-discrimination as their foundation. There has also been extensive litigation against other Cities and Counties who failed to implement acceptable quality control measures. San Francisco has been sued on multiple occasions in the by over allegations of inadequate compliance merely the City'southward best defense has been the implementation of rigorous quality control procedures by MOD, DPW, the Port, and the Airport.

First time users of Modern services are not ever prepared for MOD's strict requirements. We have found that the best way to manage expectations and to deliver a completed project in a reasonable time frame is by issuing clear information and management to the builder, possessor, and contractor. The post-obit data is a footstep by step guide to Mod's project review process, and an introduction to Mod's different forms.

The Three Different Phases of Review

In that location are three distinct phases of review: preliminary review, plan review, and field inspection for work under structure.

1. Preliminary Review

   Projection Intake Class: Preliminary review of any MOD architectural access project starts with the completion of Modernistic's Project Intake Grade (word).

   This form provides basic information including project address, contacts, description, building occupancy, valuation, and funding source. The funding source is relevant because Federal Funding triggers additional code requirements beyond the minimum set for other publicly funded projects.

   The Project Intake Form as well contains fee tables (one for new structure, and a 2nd for alterations) and a fee invoice that helps the user summate the permit fees required for MOD's review.

   Pre-Application Programme Review Meetings: Mod recommends a Pre-Awarding Programme Review coming together as a Best Exercise before you submit allow documents and plans for large or circuitous projects. This is an opportunity to evidence Modern staff conceptual drawings, to ask general questions well-nigh applicable codes, to talk over the MOD process including current turn around expectations, and to ask specific code questions about conditions that may be unique to your project. Meeting minutes confirming cardinal decisions can then be scanned onto structure drawings.

   Mod also participates in pre-application programme review meetings held at the Section of Building Inspection. Such meetings typically include representatives from DBI, Fire, and Planning Departments. This promotes better communication across the unlike departments and helps to back up the permit bidder past delivering clear and consistent guidelines.

Codes and Standards: Prior to developing whatsoever plans or scheduling whatsoever meetings, MOD recommends that the design and construction team have access to the electric current edition of the California Edifice Code (CBC), the 2010 ADA Standards, the Fair Housing Amendments Deed Blueprint Manual, the Uniform Federal Accessibility Standard, San Francisco Building Code, and other applicable codes. Many of these access standards, with the exception of the CBC, are available on line.

2. Program Review

   For sequential plan review, Modern is the first plan review station in the building permit review procedure. MOD must corroborate the plans for accessibility before the Section of Building Inspection (DBI) volition accept them for permit processing. For parallel permit processing, MOD needs to receive the plans at the same time every bit the other permit review agencies such as DBI, Planning etc.

   Plan Review: Plan review starts when you submit the Project Intake Form, make payment for plan review and field inspection services, and provide ane total size set of construction plans.

   MOD's Disability Access Compliance (pdf) projection sign off form must be filled out and scanned onto the plans, preferably on the first canvas. For existing buildings merely, designers must likewise fill out and browse a re-create of DBI'southward Disabled Access Checklist (pdf) onto the plans.

   For certain projects that do not require a DBI edifice let, like landscape projects, or park improvements, designers may submit mural drawings, photographs, or other documents describing accessibility.

   Plan Comments: MOD provides written plan review comments detailing needed corrections. The comments are sent to the Project Architect and the Projection Managing director typically via e-mail. Equally part of the comments, MOD volition review whatsoever unreasonable hardship requests, provide guidance for technical infeasibility documentation, and make recommendations to DBI.

   Program Corrections: The Project Architect must submit revised plans responsive to plan comments (if corrections are required). When submitting revisions, a summary memo or canvass must back-trail the plans and explain which sheet and detail number addresses MOD'due south asking for corrections. Note: Incomplete plans, plans which lack summaries, or uncorrected plans, volition lead to project delays and potentially additional Modern permit fees.

   Plan Approval: One time MOD receives final plans and confirms all corrections have been made; MOD will postage two sets of plans "Approved". The tertiary gear up volition be retained by Modernistic. Modern also stamps and signs the edifice permit application.

3. Field Inspection - MOD inspects all projects following Modern program review.

   Start Work Inspection: Mod recommends a Start Work Inspection as a Best Practice. This can occur later the foundations have been poured, but before the framing has advanced very far. The purpose for this inspection is to meet with the architect, contractor, and owner for a give-and-take about required Modernistic inspections and recommendations for avoiding common construction errors.

   Framing Inspection: A rough frame inspection by MOD is mandatory for virtually MOD projects. This inspection occurs after plumbing and electrical crude work has been installed and inspected, before the crude frame sign off by the DBI Building Inspector, and earlier insulation and sheetrock have been installed. MOD looks for take hold of bar blocking, minimum accessibility clearances effectually doors and hallways, and the rough in locations for accessible plumbing and electrical fixtures and devices. Any non-complying items found volition be documented with either a correction find or notes on the DBI Job Record Carte. When the rough frame work is approved, Mod signs off on the Job Bill of fare.

   Mock-Upwardly Inspections: Mod recommends mock-up unit inspections every bit a All-time Practice on large projects, especially attainable and affordable housing development. Grab bar blocking locations, door swings, fixture clearances in tight spaces, and adaptable cabinets are typical items reviewed in a mock-up before the projection replicates repeating elements.

   Pre-Finals and Temporary Certificates of Occupancy (TCO): Modern recommends calling for a pre-final inspection as a All-time Practice at least a week or more than earlier the project needs either a Temporary Certificate of Completion or a Terminal Inspection. Any non-complying items found will be documented with either a correction detect or notes on the DBI Job Tape Card. When the TCO is approved past Modern, MOD confirms their approval for the TCO on either the DBI Job Carte or DBI's TCO grade. Calling early allows the contractor enough fourth dimension to make corrections before Modernistic's required sign off and approving of a TCO.

   Final Inspections and Certificates of Final Completion (CFC): A Final Inspection past Modern is mandatory for all MOD projects. When the Final is approved by Modern, Modern confirms their approval by signing the DBI Chore Bill of fare. When the scope of work is for a new building or a change in utilise or occupancy, and so the Section of Building Inspection will additionally prepare a Certificate of Final Completion.

To scheduled an inspection email Nathan Webb at nathan.webb@sfgov.org.

4. Appeals Process
   Frequently Asked Questions nearly Appealing a Decision Fabricated by Modernistic or DPW

   The Section of Public Works and the Mayor's Part on Inability are the master departments responsible for the admission review of city-funded projects. On those occasions when architects (or developers) have disagreed with findings of the ADA Coordinator or compliance Officer making a decision, previously at that place was no formal process to review the decision or have a neutral body respond.The following is the appeal process that has been created.

   A. What types of issues may be appealed?
   Federal, Land, or Local admission lawmaking interpretations

   B. Who may file an appeal?
   Project Managers, Project Architects and Project Engineers with the approval of the Agency Managers, Private architects or developers in contact with the City for projects that MOD reviews.

   C. When do I need to entreatment?
   For site reviews, the appeal should be made every bit soon as possible, only within 20 business organisation days of receiving the dial list. For plan reviews an appeal should exist filed within 30 business organization days from the receipt of plan comments. No appeal will be accustomed afterward the project has been advertised for bid.

   D. How do I file an appeal?

   E. How will the appeal exist handled?

   • Submit an entreatment in writing.
   • Attach a encompass letter describing the result being appealed.
   • Include the Project Name, Job Guild #, Project Manager'southward Name & Telephone #, and Appellant's Name & Phone #.
   • Provide a map of the area as advisable.
   • Provide drawings equally appropriate.
   • Provide pictures as appropriate.
   • Submit the above data/material to the Manager of MOD for projects reviewed by MOD and to the Director of DPW for projects reviewed by DPW
   • The Director of Public Works or the Director of Mod will designate a panel of three people who will review the data/fabric.
   • The console will consist of two code experts and one neutral, merely knowledgeable party. (The neutral, knowledgeable political party is intended to provide a common sense perspective, should the experts disagree.)
   • If needed, the console will run into with the appellant and with the ADA Coordinator.
   • The console will event their recommendation to the Manager.
   • The Manager volition make the final decision.

culliganhishousy.blogspot.com

Source: https://sfgov.org/mod/project-review-process-plan-check-and-inspection

Share this post